Tag Archives: splinters

It’s Your Response?

Posted on by 0 comment

My partner opened one spade in first seat (favorable vulnerability). My right hand opponent passed. I wondered how to respond with this hand:

I thought splinter (response of 4 hearts showing shortness) is out because of my singleton king of hearts.

The hand is not good enough for a game forcing raise of spades by responding 2NT (Jacoby). I did not want to encouage partner to investigate slam.

And the hand looks to good for a limit raise of 3 spades. I don’t want partner to pass the invitation.

My solution: respond 4 spades. I want to make sure we get to game opposite partner’s opening. I think Bergen would agree with treating my singleton for its shortness feature rather than its high card points.

How would you respond?

 

 

Eye Opening Slam Bidding

Posted on by 0 comment

I discovered new slam bidding insights when kibitzing this hand recently on BBO. East-West were world-class players Robert Levin and Geoff Hampson.

Rlevin Slam

East forced to game in spades with his Jacoby 2NT response. His hand was too good to make a splinter response of four clubs.

Rlevin Slam1

 

Rlevin Slam2

When East next asked about kings, West denied having any by jumping to six spades (East already knew about the king of spades from the RKCB inquiry). Eye opening slam bidding by EW.

*25 Conventions You Should Know by Barbara Seagram and Marc Smith, p. 86. Entire book is highly recommend: https://www.amazon.com/Bridge-Conventions-You-Should-Know/dp/189415407X

FYI nicesummary of RKCB  http://web2.acbl.org/documentLibrary/play/Commonly_Used_Conventions/romankeycard.pdf

Levin also demonstrated how to play this well-bid hand. Here is his puzzle for you: How did Levin hold his heart losers to one after lead of a low diamond by North? I will get to that tomorrow.

Cue Bidding to Slam?

Posted on by 0 comment

 

 

 

 

Update 2/1/2020: Thanks to Robin. She alerted me in the comments that the 2NT response on this hand should be a game forcing raise in hearts rather than spades.

qbid1

qbid2

 

qbid3

 

More on Jacoby 2NT here. More on Splinters here.

Splinter Response

Posted on by 0 comment

splinter1

splinter2

Look here for more on splinters.

Do we have a slam?

Posted on by 0 comment

There was lots of postmortem discussion on this hand the other day:

GF in spades

Nobody got to six spades, yet all were making six. How can you bid it? Answer is you cannot, and you should not. It only makes because of the lucky diamond features and location of heart queen. Moreover, spades are behaving nicely (West does not hold A J x of spades). Everything worked just right in this unlikely lie of the cards.

But say you gave North the diamond king rather than the king of clubs, so that the hand looked like this:

GF in spades a

North’s hand is actually improved a bit with the marriage of top two diamonds. But there is no play for six spades in this layout. NS prospects are hampered by duplicative values in diamonds.

This revised hand (board 22a) illustrates the usefulness of splinter bids. South opens the bidding one club and North responds one spade (EW are silent). Now South splinters by jumping to four diamonds (one level higher than a jump shift)! The jarring nature of the jump by partner also jars the memory, so it’s easy to remember that you are playing splinters. The game-forcing splinter promises shortness in diamonds (singleton or void). North becomes aware of the duplicative values in diamonds and signs off in four spades.

Of course, you and partner must agree beforehand that you are playing splinters. Here is the relevant portion of the convention card:

CC majors w arrow

Notice that splinters (in red on the convention card) are alertable. You can often make a small slam with fewer that 33 points when partner knows that the shortness coveyed by the splinterer is a feature (e.g. not duplicative value).