Bad Trump Break

Posted on by 0 comment

You are in three diamonds (both vul) as South. North had a difficult decision after West’s preempt and reasonably chose to respond three diamonds. That’s where the bidding ended:

bad trump break1

West led the ace of spades, South playing the Jack and you the six (trying to hide the spade situation from West). West continued with a low spade and East ruffed with the six of diamonds.

 

At trick 3 East shifts to the nine of hearts. You play the jack and it wins as West follows with the deuce.

 

At trick 4 you lead the deuce of diamonds, West discards a low spade, you play the king and East plays a low diamond. How many diamonds did East start with? It does not look like you will make the contract. What do you do now?

 

When I observed the hand, declarer did not get flummoxed. She reasoned that she needed to do as well or better than the other NS pairs. After all, diamonds were going to break 5-0 for all declarers. She managed to hold it to down one. Do you see how?

 

She had lost one spade, one spade ruff, and was sure to lose two more diamonds. If she could hold her club losers to one, she would get out for down 1. It was likely that East held the club ace, so if she could endplay East, the ace would be her only club loser.

 

At tricks five and six she cashed her two top hearts ending in hand. Then she led a low spade ruffed with dummy’s and overruffed with East’s nine. At trick eight East led the diamond queen taken with declarer’s ace. At trick nine she led the king of spades, but East could see the endplay coming and refused to ruff. Declarer then led a trump to East’s winner and the endplay was complete, resulting in 75 percent of the matchpoints for NS.

Here is the entire hand:

bad trump break2

 

You may want to lay out the hand with cards on the table to make sure you follow it all.

BTW, West erred in leading the ace of spades. Any other lead and South will go down two. Some declarers went down three, failing to make the endplay.

It’s Your Call

Posted on by 2 comments

 

MikeL13

 

What would you say and why?

Katz Play

Posted on by 0 comment

Here is a hand I saw played by Ralph Katz sitting South:

Katz Play

Note that Katz will go down immediately if West leads a diamond. However, West chose the reasonable lead of the ace of clubs.

Katz ruffed and visualized the East hand. This is what I infer that Katz was thinking: East had opened the bidding and, after rebidding his diamonds, should hold the ace and king of diamonds. West led the ace of clubs, so presumably has the king as well. Also, it appears that an unbalanced hand with length in clubs would justify West’s aggressive bidding. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that East holds the Q J of hearts to justify his opening bid.

Assume Katz visualized a hand like the one East held, do you see how he avoided losing one heart and two diamonds? He made his doubled contract! How did Katz Play?

Game or Slam?

Posted on by 0 comment

You are in 2nd seat holding this fabulous hand.

fab hand2

Counting 9+ tricks, you open two clubs. Partner responds two diamonds, waiting. Your rebid is two spades, and partner raises you to three spades. How do you interpret partner’s bid and what is your next call?

Note that partner did not go right to game as she might have done with a minimum hand and spade support (known as “fast arrival”). She is suggesting your side may have potential beyond game. With that in mind, cue bid four clubs to show 1st round control.

Good news: Partner cooperates further by cue bidding four hearts, showing 1st round control of hearts and denying 1st round control of diamonds. Now you should jump to six spades, knowing you have a good play for the slam.

Overcall?

Posted on by 0 comment

Your right-hand opponent opens the bidding one diamond, and you must decide what to do with this nice hand (none vul):

overcall1S

Your hand seems too good to pass. An overcall of 1NT seems to be out of the question absent a stopper in diamonds. A takeout double might work, since you have tolerance for the majors. But partner will think you have four hearts. Keep in mind that partner and left-hand opponent likely have no more than 11 points between them.

How about overcalling one spade with that powerful 4-card suit? That gets you into the auction with little risk. It also gives partner encouragement to lead a spade if LHO gets the contract.

Planning your Rebid

Posted on by 0 comment

Here is a common situation. You have a minimum opening hand, so you must plan a rebid that does not get the auction too high should partner respond one spade.

rebid3

I recommend opening one diamond, planning to make a comfortable rebid of two clubs. That distorts partner’s image of your shape, but she will clearly know that your opening bid was minimum.

You may want to change that plan if opponents interfere. For example, say your left-hand opponent overcalls one heart, and your partner responds one spade. Since your partner did not make a negative double, you know she has at least five spades (double would promise exactly four spades). In that situation I recommend you switch your rebid to 1NT. Partner will know that you have fewer than three spades. And even though your spade is singleton, it sure is a nice one!

Rebid Dilemma

Posted on by 0 comment

rebid2

 

I was too cautious and we missed our game.

A Mirage?

Posted on by 0 comment

You are South in four hearts after the bidding shown below:

Mirage

West leads the ace of clubs, East playing the deuce. At trick two West shifts to the jack of spades. You play the queen, East plays the king, and you win with the ace.

You have one spade loser and two club losers. How are you going to handle the trump suit for no losers? The percentage play when missing three trumps is to finesse for the king. But how are you going to get to dummy to do that?

Instead of the heart finesse, maybe you can discard your losing spade on the ace of diamonds? But that requires that you drop the singleton king of hearts, otherwise the defense will cash their spade winner before you can get to dummy.

Is that king of diamonds a mirage? Maybe it would be helpful for you to think of it as a low diamond. Does that make you decision any easier?

 

Hard to Put on the Brakes

Posted on by 0 comment

It was hard for NS to put on the brakes on this hand:

no brakes

 

South decided to make the takeout double rather than overcall with his nice hand. When his rebid was two spades, he confirmed a big hand. North was broke and signed off in three diamonds, which went down two.

I suggest South could have done better by overcalling one spade at 1st turn. In retrospect the Q 8 of hearts should be downgraded, and there is too much uncertainty about finding a spade fit. The overcall will get that cleared up immediately. (It’s, of course, easy for me to say all this when all four hands are visible!)

Be careful not to fall in love with your hand when RHO has opened the bidding. Your partner is unlikely to have much help.

Notice the difference between this auction and the auction in my last two posts (here and here) on this hand. This time East chose not to open 1NT while holding a five-card major. Opening 1NT with a five-card major works out most of the time in opinion of experts. But this time the major suit opening bid worked out better for EW.

What’ Your Call?

Posted on by 0 comment

penalty dbl1

Partner’s double is for penalty, so don’t worry about your crummy hand. Partner knows its crummy. See my last post on this situation here.

Your Call with this Nice Hand?

Posted on by 0 comment

penalty dbl

 

Make sure you discuss this situation with partner when filling out your convention card. Here is what that portion of convention card looks like:

CC penalty dbl

A Difficult Grand

Posted on by 0 comment

 

 

 

 See update below 3/31/2020

grand slam1

You have one losing spade. If you can drop the jack of hearts in the third round, you will be able to pitch two losing spades from dummy. That’s a 27 percent chance. Do you see any other possibilities?

Update 3/31/2020: Declarer played low from dummy and tried to set up her hearts to discard two spade losers as suggested above. It did not work. She missed the slight chance that opening lead was from K Q of diamonds. If she had played the 10 of diamonds at trick one her problems would have been over.

Third Hand Play?

Posted on by 0 comment

You are East defending 3NT, and your partner’s opening lead is the 10 of diamonds. You see this dummy and recollect the bidding shown:

third hand play

Which card to you play and what is your plan? (See below)

Things are looking good. You have a sure entry with the ace of spades, and partner must have about seven HCP (why?). Since partner is surely leading from a perfect or almost perfect sequence, you should unblock with the jack.

Assuming declarer wins the 1st trick with the king or queen, which diamond will you play later when you are in with the ace of spades? This is something that comes up a lot, and many players get it wrong. East should play the four of diamonds, giving declarer remaining count. High-low shows an even number of diamonds remaining. Partner will know how many diamonds declarer started with and whether she can cash her remaining diamonds.

 

Opening Lead?

Posted on by 0 comment

opening lead1

You would like to set up your long diamond suit. Best in my opinion is to lead 4th best diamond — the five of diamonds. Your 10 9 of diamonds is not a good enough sequence.

Leading the 10 should promise the nine as well as the eight or seven. 10 9 8 is a perfect sequence for leading the 10 (top of sequence). 10 9 7 is an almost perfect sequence. From either of those holdings I would lead the 10

Botched Play?

Posted on by 0 comment

This hand played by experts on BBO was bid nicely, but the play was botched. Follow along and see if you agree:

botch1

South got to four hearts after she opened the bidding one club, her LHO overcalled one spade, and her partner made a negative double.

Opening lead by West was the king of spades. Declarer won the ace, played a trump to dummy’s ace, and led a low club to the queen which won. Declarer can now conclude that West has the ace of clubs. If trumps split 3-2 and West has the king of diamonds, this contract should make: Go to dummy with a second round of trumps and lead a diamond toward the king-queen. If West plays the ace your diamonds are set up and your king of clubs is protected. If West plays low, you draw a third round of trumps and lead another diamond toward the queen. Contract should make with one spade loser, one diamond loser and one club loser.

Inexplicably to me, declarer led another club back toward the king at trick four and down she went. Here is the entire hand:

botch2

Eye Opening Declarer Play

Posted on by 0 comment

Yesterday I wrote about an eye opening slam auction by Robert Levin and Geoff Hampson. I enjoyed a two-fer when Levin’s play of the slam also opened my eyes! Here was the hand and the bidding with Levin sitting West.

Rlevin Slam3

Rlevin Slam4

Rlevin Slam6JPG

rl

A slam will bid and well played.

 

:

Eye Opening Slam Bidding

Posted on by 0 comment

I discovered new slam bidding insights when kibitzing this hand recently on BBO. East-West were world-class players Robert Levin and Geoff Hampson.

Rlevin Slam

East forced to game in spades with his Jacoby 2NT response. His hand was too good to make a splinter response of four clubs.

Rlevin Slam1

 

Rlevin Slam2

When East next asked about kings, West denied having any by jumping to six spades (East already knew about the king of spades from the RKCB inquiry). Eye opening slam bidding by EW.

*25 Conventions You Should Know by Barbara Seagram and Marc Smith, p. 86. Entire book is highly recommend: https://www.amazon.com/Bridge-Conventions-You-Should-Know/dp/189415407X

FYI nicesummary of RKCB  http://web2.acbl.org/documentLibrary/play/Commonly_Used_Conventions/romankeycard.pdf

Levin also demonstrated how to play this well-bid hand. Here is his puzzle for you: How did Levin hold his heart losers to one after lead of a low diamond by North? I will get to that tomorrow.

Quote of the Day

Posted on by 0 comment

The control-showing cuebid was the single most significant advance in bidding theory ever made, and is far more useful for accurate slam bidding than Blackwood* can ever be.

*I would add Roman Keycard Blackwood as well.

This is from 25 Conventions You Should Know by Barbara Seagram and Marc Smith. Use cuebids whenever possible.

Opening Lead Against Notrump?

Posted on by 0 comment

lead against NT

lead against NT2

Best to lead top of a perfect or almost perfect sequence. Lead 4th highest from a long suit only when it is broken.

Declarer will have a very difficult time making 3NT if you don’t give away that trick to the 10 of spades.

Logic of a Preempt

Posted on by 0 comment

preempt logic